ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Attrition rates in hand and wrist trauma trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHand and wrist injuries are increasingly prevalent and impact individuals' abilities to participate in society and generate income. Attrition in the hand and wrist trauma treatment time course and trials is a recognised issue, with patients disengaging from follow-up due to various logistical and socioeconomic barriers. While several studies have addressed this, the timeline and causes of attrition in trials remain inconsistent. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the attrition rates among patients with hand and wrist trauma across all prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs), identifying critical time points for attrition, at-risk patient populations, and comparing surgical versus non-surgical interventions.
methodsThe databases Embase, PubMed, and CENRAL will be searched. Abstracts will be screened by two persons independently to identify eligible studies. The systematic review will include prospective randomised controlled trials in participants with hand and/or wrist trauma. The review will consider patient demographics and proportions of attrition rates at time frames of 30 days, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months. The meta-analysis will compare attrition time frame considering patient demographics, intervention and injury types, and documented attrition reasons. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 will be used to assess the risk of methodological bias in the randomised controlled trials. DISCUSSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will address the critical gap in understanding attrition rates in hand/wrist trauma research. By identifying which patients are at risk and when attrition occurs, we aim to develop a toolkit to improve follow-up rates and, in turn, patient outcomes. Ultimately, the findings will inform future clinical practices and research methodologies, contributing to more representative and robust evidence in hand/wrist trauma management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024588638.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.