SynthesisChiropractic & manual therapies2026
Effects of percussive therapy dosages on recovery from acute exercise-induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePercussive therapy (PT) is increasingly used for post-exercise recovery, but its effects and dose-related responses after exercise-induced muscle damage remain uncertain. This review evaluated the effects of PT on neuromuscular performance, muscle soreness, and biochemical markers after acute exercise.
methodsThe study adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) published through November 26, 2025. Risk of bias, methodological quality, and certainty of evidence were assessed using RoB 2, PEDro, and GRADE. Data analysis was performed using Stata-MP 18.0 software.
resultsTwelve RCTs were included. PT improved countermovement jump recovery compared with control (k = 13, g = 0.78, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.29, p < 0.01; low certainty) and reduced creatine kinase levels (k = 7, g = - 0.87, 95% CI - 1.57 to - 0.17, p = 0.02; very low certainty). PT did not clearly improve maximum voluntary contraction recovery (k = 8, g = 0.12, 95% CI - 0.10 to 0.34, p = 0.28; moderate certainty) or delayed onset muscle soreness (k = 17, g = 0.14, 95% CI - 0.19 to 0.48, p = 0.40; very low certainty). Exploratory analyses suggested that longer treatment (> 5 min per muscle group) was associated with larger countermovement jump effects, whereas 2.5-5 min protocols at higher frequency (≥ 50 Hz) were associated with creatine kinase reduction. Longer treatment was also associated with higher delayed onset muscle soreness scores.
conclusionPT may improve explosive performance recovery and reduce early creatine kinase levels, but current evidence does not support clear benefits for maximum strength recovery or soreness relief. Dose-related findings are preliminary and should not be interpreted as prescriptive thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.