ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026
A digital yoga-based 'Pause Grow Reflect' intervention for postgraduate researchers: a feasibility randomised controlled trial and embedded qualitative acceptability study.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of mental health and well-being problems among postgraduate researchers (PGRs) is concerning. Self-care is a protective factor; however, engagement can be low. Interventions to date are not theory-driven nor co-developed. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a co-created, theory-driven digital yoga-based self-care intervention (Pause Grow Reflect).
methodsA 2:1 randomised feasibility trial of the 7-week Pause Grow Reflect intervention and embedded qualitative study was conducted in UK PGRs. Primary outcomes included rates of recruitment, retention, follow-up, adherence, and engagement. Secondary outcomes assessed fidelity, acceptability, adverse events, and preliminary signals of efficacy. Criteria determined progression to a definitive trial. An embedded qualitative study comprising 1:1 semi-structured interviews was guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and data analysed using deductive thematic analysis.
resultsPGRs were allocated to the intervention (n = 24) or control (n = 13) group. Progression criteria were met for recruitment, T1 assessments, and acceptability, whilst rates of retention, engagement, and T2 follow-up assessments were not. Marginal mean differences for stress were observed. The qualitative data (n = 10 interviews) showed that all seven TFA domains were important, with issues mostly reported for the constructs of 'burden' and 'opportunity costs'.
conclusionPause Grow Reflect was largely feasible to deliver and acceptable within a UK context, and may be a promising offer to promote self-care during doctoral programmes. Further intervention refinement would promote better rates of retention, adherence, and engagement. Preliminary observations were positive, though a larger RCT is needed to determine efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.