Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286677›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026

Restoring neuroplasticity after CNS trauma: cell therapy approaches in spinal cord and traumatic brain injury.

Ana T Palha, Marta F Lima, Melyssa Carvalho, Jonas Campos, Belém Sampaio-Marques, António J Salgado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana T Palha *Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Marta F Lima *Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Melyssa Carvalho *Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Jonas CamposLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
Belém Sampaio-MarquesLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal.
António J SalgadoLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, 4710-057, Portugal. asalgado@med.uminho.pt.

Funding

Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Norte NORTE2030-FEDER-00764200Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2024.02422.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2025.05916.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LA/P/0050/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/06304/2023Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa M04/2017Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa MC-18-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe central nervous system (CNS) has a limited regenerative capacity, rendering traumatic injuries such as spinal cord injury (SCI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) highly disabling and difficult to treat. These insults trigger complex pathophysiological cascades, including extensive cell death, sustained inflammation, and the formation of a hostile inhibitory microenvironment that compromises neural plasticity and hampers tissue regeneration. The multifactorial nature of these mechanisms, together with a fragmented understanding of CNS plasticity, has hindered the development of effective therapeutic interventions. MAIN BODY: In recent years, cell-based therapies have emerged as promising strategies to support neural repair and induce pro-regenerative processes. This approach encompasses multiple cell types, including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs), as well as neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs). Clinical studies in SCI have reported functional improvements, particularly following treatment with BMSCs and peripheral blood-derived stem cells, although substantial methodological heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions. In TBI, clinical evidence remains more limited; however, preclinical studies consistently demonstrate the neuroprotective and regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies. Beyond direct cell transplantation, increasing attention has been given to cell-free approaches, including secretome and extracellular vesicle-based strategies, which recapitulate many of the beneficial effects while potentially overcoming safety and logistical constraints.

conclusionsOverall, both cell-based and cell-free therapeutic strategies show significant potential to enhance neuroplasticity, attenuate secondary injury, and promote functional recovery following CNS trauma. Nevertheless, successful clinical translation will require larger, well-controlled trials and the establishment of standardized protocols addressing optimal timing, dosage, and routes of administration.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCentral Nervous SystemNeuronal PlasticitySpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsHumansCentral nervous systemSpinal cord injuryStem cellTherapyTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42286677
PMCPMC13488253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.