ArticleBMC nutrition2026
Estimating dietary intake and nutrient adequacy among adults in Saudi Arabia: a population-based assessment.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating multivitamin and mineral supplement use and associated nutrient intake in Saudi Arabia: a probabilistic modeling study.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
- Evaluation of dietary iron exposure across iron compounds and fortification levels in Saudi Arabia: simulation modeling study.BMC nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon‑communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a significant health challenge in Saudi Arabia, where 18.95% of adults report at least one chronic condition, including diabetes (9.1%), hypertension (7.9%), and cardiovascular diseases (1.5%). This burden highlights the need for reliable, national‑level estimation of dietary intake and nutrient adequacy to inform evidence‑based nutrition policy. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate dietary intake, nutrient exposure, and adequacy among Saudi adults using an updated, locally developed probabilistic model (NNC‑v2).
methodsThis modeling study was developed a model using nationally published data from Saudi Arabia starting in 2010. The model was designed to generate probabilistic estimates that account for uncertainty and variability by linking food supply data to population-level intake and nutrient exposure. Model parameters were specified as statistical distributions rather than fixed values, allowing variability and uncertainty to propagate through the estimation process. Age-related intake adjustment and routine variation were incorporated within the model structure. Nutrient adequacy was evaluated using a Monte Carlo-based Average Requirement cut-point approach (10,000 iterations). Predictive performance was assessed indirectly by comparing model-derived food expenditure with national survey data.
resultsGrains estimated intake (mean 278 g/day), followed by protein foods (120 g/day). Median energy intake was 2399 kcal/day in males and 2366 kcal/day in females. Estimated intake levels were evaluated against the Average Requirement (AR) values of 320 µg/day for folate and 75-90 mg/day for vitamin C. Among individuals with intake below the AR, the mean intake gaps were approximately 97 µg/day for folate and 27 mg/day for vitamin C. Magnesium intake was evaluated relative to AR values of 350 mg/day for males and 255 mg/day for females. Model-estimated monthly food expenditure closely aligned with national data (7% difference in 2018; 2% in 2023).
conclusionsNNC-v2 offers a probabilistic framework for estimating dietary intake and nutrient adequacy at the national level in Saudi Arabia within the available data sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.