ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
At the edge of viability: neonatologists' moral experience under uncertainty in Türkiye.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical decision-making in periviability, typically between 22 and 25 weeks of gestation, represents one of the most complex intersections of medicine and ethics. Characterised by profound prognostic uncertainty and the absence of clear ethical consensus, this period places neonatologists under significant moral, emotional, and institutional pressure. This study explores how neonatologists in Türkiye experience ethical challenges when making clinical decisions for infants born at the threshold of viability.
methodsA qualitative phenomenological design was employed. Between March 2022 and June 2023, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 neonatologists working in tertiary and quaternary neonatal intensive care units across different regions of Türkiye. Data collection continued until data saturation was reached. All interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsFive interrelated themes were identified that characterise neonatologists' moral experiences in periviable care: moral decision-making under prognostic uncertainty; moral distress in perceived non-beneficial treatment; moral tensions in clinician-parent interactions; legal and institutional constraints on ethical decision-making; and moral loneliness in periviable care. Together, these themes highlight the ethical complexity of caring for infants at the threshold of viability, where uncertainty, responsibility, relational tensions, and structural pressures intersect.
conclusionIn neonatal intensive care settings in Türkiye, periviable care is experienced as an ethically complex practice shaped by clinical uncertainty and institutional conditions. Strengthening institutional mechanisms for ethical deliberation may help reduce clinicians' experiences of moral loneliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.