ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Moral intensity and ethical sensitivity in pre-service therapeutic sciences clinicians: a vignette-level analysis of ethical principle recognition and ethical sensitivity skills.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethical sensitivity is a foundational component of moral functioning, enabling individuals to recognise ethically salient aspects of situations. In healthcare education, this capacity is critical for ethical practice. While ethics education often emphasises ethical principle knowledge, less is known about how contextual features of moral situations-such as moral intensity-relate to different components of ethical sensitivity. This retrospective cross-sectional study examined vignette-level associations between moral intensity and ethical sensitivity using previously collected data from 120 final-year pre-service clinicians across the therapeutic sciences. Twelve clinical vignettes from the Measuring Instrument for Ethical Sensitivity in the Therapeutic Sciences (MIEST) were independently rated for moral intensity using Jones's six-dimension framework. Moral intensity scores ranged from 20 to 28 (possible range 6-30). Moral intensity was not associated with ethical principle recognition or overall ethical sensitivity scores. However, a strong positive vignette-level correlation was observed between moral intensity and ethical sensitivity skill identification (r = 0.81, p = 0.001). These findings provide preliminary empirical support for ethical sensitivity as a multidimensional construct and suggest that contextual features of moral situations may differentially engage perceptual-affective components of ethical sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.