Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286609›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Developing quality improvement awareness, skills, and emerging leadership behaviors through clinical audits in postgraduate medical education.

Lisanne Hut-Mossel, Eva De Felice, Gera Welker, Jaap Tulleken, Kees Ahaus, Reinold Gans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisanne Hut-MosselDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. p.a.hut-mossel@pl.hanze.nl.
Eva De FeliceDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gera WelkerUMC Staff Policy and Management Support, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jaap TullekenDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kees AhausDepartment of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinold GansDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality improvement (QI) is a crucial competency for medical residents navigating the complexities of modern healthcare systems. This study explores the impact of experiential learning, through clinical audits, on residents' QI awareness, QI skills and emerging QI leadership behaviors within their clinical learning environment.

methodsA retrospective multiple embedded case study was conducted within two departments of a University Medical Centre in the Netherlands. We interviewed residents (n = 11), supervisors (n = 7), training program directors (n = 2), and a quality officer within two years after the clinical audit. Data analysis involved within and cross-department analysis to identify factors influencing the development of QI awareness, QI skills and emerging QI leadership behaviors in residents.

resultsResidents develop QI awareness and QI skills through increased experiential knowledge, by presenting audit data and inspiring colleagues to implement change, by being aware of shared QI responsibility, demonstrating emerging QI leadership behaviors legitimized by the clinical audit and its outcome, and by striving to complete the full clinical audit cycle, including implementation and re-evaluation. Challenges for the successful implementation of clinical audits include the following: (1) Recognizing the value of clinical audits by residents and shared responsibility at work for auditing and improving patient care, (2) Department leadership's support in ensuring commitment from all healthcare professionals to clinical audits as a QI Instrument, (3) Faculty role modeling in line with the department leadership's goal that quality improvement is an integral part of daily practice, and (4) Healthcare professionals' commitment to fostering teamwork and collaborative learning.

conclusionsThis study shows that clinical audits can support residents in developing QI awareness and QI skills; however, this effectiveness was variable. Progression beyond data collection and analysis towards implementing improvements and demonstrating emerging QI leadership behaviors was limited and strongly shaped by the clinical learning environment. Effective development of these skills and behaviors therefore depends on a supportive environment in which medical staff values clinical audits, actively participates in the audit process, and embeds audits within departments' clinical governance.

Indexed as

Clinical AuditClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyLeadershipQuality ImprovementAwarenessHumansNetherlandsProblem-Based LearningRetrospective StudiesHospital careLeadershipQualitative researchQuality improvementResidents

Identifiers

PMID42286609
PMCPMC13487943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.