ArticleBMC oral health2026
Finite element analysis of the nonlinear response of oral mucosa in labial tissue induced by spherical versus square self-ligating brackets.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study employs finite element analysis (FEA) to compare the biomechanical effects of spherical versus square self-ligating brackets on the labial mucosa.
methodsTwo distinct tooth-bracket-lip models, featuring spherical and square brackets, were developed to simulate labial tissue mechanical responses under various incisor spatial configurations. Each model incorporated five clinical scenarios and employed a hyperelastic Ogden model, a two-stage simulation process (bracket placement followed by orthodontic sliding), and a hierarchical computational framework for localized stress analysis. Nonlinear interactions-including contact, material, and geometric couplings-were rigorously resolved.
resultsThe stress concentration areas on the labial mucosa are primarily attributed to the clip groove of the spherical bracket and the edge angle of the square bracket, respectively. Under various loading conditions, the maximum stress exerted on the labial mucosa by the spherical bracket consistently remains lower than that induced by the square bracket. Furthermore, compared to the square bracket, the spherical bracket features a smoother surface profile, which significantly reduces mechanical stress on the labial mucosa and achieves a more uniform pressure distribution.
conclusionsSpherical brackets significantly reduce biomechanical stress on the labial mucosa by optimizing surface topography. This advantage may result in a lower incidence of mucosal lesions and improved clinical comfort, supporting their preferential application in orthodontic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.