ArticleBMC medical education2026
MRI for patients with autism: evaluating radiologic technologists' awareness and practice in Saudi healthcare settings.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMRI can be challenging for patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) due to sensory sensitivities and radiologic technologists (RTs) play a key role in managing these challenges. Therefore, this study aims to assess Saudi RTs' knowledge, practices, and experiences in managing individuals with ASD undergoing MRI, as well as identify barriers and facilitators of effective practice.
methodsA cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted using an online questionnaire (n = 335) and semi-structured interviews (n = 8). Data collection occurred between April and May 2023, and the results were analyzed using SPSS v25 and thematic analysis.
resultsOnly 13% of RTs had formal training in ASD care. While knowledge scores were relatively high (61% high-level), practice and training scores were weak (51% and 50% low-level, respectively). In addition, a modest positive correlation was observed between training and practice domains (r = 0.121, p = 0.027). Moreover, thematic analysis highlighted three themes: RTs' knowledge gaps, variability in practice, and the need for clear guidelines.
conclusionThese results indicate that there is a significant gap between RTs' knowledge and practical readiness in handling individuals with ASD during MRI. Consequently, tailored training programs and standardized protocols are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.