ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Thematic structure of clinically oriented prefrontal function assessment and intervention research: a keyword network analysis.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prefrontal cortex (PFC) has been extensively investigated in relation to higher-order cognition, emotional regulation, and behavioural control, particularly within clinically oriented studies addressing psychiatric symptoms, self-regulation, and intervention outcomes. Although a growing body of literature has examined prefrontal function assessment and intervention, the thematic organization and structural interconnections within this clinically focused literature have not been sufficiently clarified. Mapping these conceptual relationships may help identify dominant research concentrations and underrepresented areas within the retrieved literature.
methodsA total of 1,301 peer-reviewed articles published between January 2014 and December 2024 were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. After keyword extraction and standardization, the top 52 high-frequency terms were analyzed using NetMiner 4.0. Network indices including density, inclusiveness, and average path length were calculated, together with degree and betweenness centrality. Cohesive subgroup analysis was additionally performed to identify thematic clusters within the keyword network.
resultsThe keyword network demonstrated a density of 0.408, inclusiveness of 1.0, and an average distance of 1.621, indicating a highly connected structure without isolated nodes. Central hubs included Cognition, Depressive disorders, Randomized controlled trial, Cognitive behavioural therapy, and Psychotherapy, which emerged as the principal structural hubs, suggesting that the retrieved literature was strongly concentrated on standardized cognitive assessment and clinically applied intervention frameworks. Mobile health, E-health intervention, and Chronic illness group also showed substantial structural influence. Cohesive subgroup analysis identified seven differentiated thematic clusters spanning cognitive rehabilitation, emotional regulation, psychotherapy, digital self-management, mindfulness-based executive support, stress resilience, and neurocognitive motivation.
conclusionsThe retrieved literature analyzed in this study exhibited a strongly interconnected thematic structure centered on clinically oriented assessment and intervention domains. Because direct neuroimaging and neurophysiological modalities were comparatively less represented in the retrieved dataset, the present findings should be interpreted as a structural mapping of clinically weighted prefrontal function research rather than a comprehensive representation of the entire methodological landscape. Nevertheless, this network-based analysis provides a systematic overview of current thematic concentrations and offers a useful foundation for future comparative and longitudinal investigations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.