Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286552›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Periosteum-enhanced triple-pass Krackow stitch provides higher ultimate load than conventional Krackow methods in a bovine patellar tendon model: a controlled biomechanical study.

Hamit Çağlayan Kahraman, Mehmet Demirel, Cem Yıldırım, Reşit Karaköse, Sude Gücük, Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ, Yavuz Kocabey

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hamit Çağlayan KahramanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, İçerenköy Mahallesi, Hastane Sokak No:1/8, Ataşehir, İstanbul, Türkiye. 2128001009@ogrenci.sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-9300
Mehmet DemirelIstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-7719
Cem YıldırımDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Atlas University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4540-1927
Reşit KaraköseDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Erzurum City Hospital, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0777-0413
Sude GücükIzmir Institute of Technology, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5573-475X
Süreyya Ergün BozdağMechanical Engineering Faculty, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-1129
Yavuz KocabeyYavuz Kocabey Private Clinic, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-7458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn all-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, grafts with free tendon ends require bilateral suturing to suspensory fixation devices during preparation. Despite prior descriptions of periosteal augmentation techniques and biomechanical analyses of different suture configurations, no study has specifically examined the biomechanical properties of a periosteum-augmented graft sutured with the Krackow technique. To address the uncertainty regarding the biomechanical superiority of suture configurations, three graft preparation techniques were biomechanically compared.

methodsBovine patellar tendons were mounted with the patellar end secured in the upper grip and the free tibial end fixed in the lower grip after preparation with one of three suture configurations: a periosteum-augmented triple-pass Krackow stitch (Group 1), a standard triple-pass Krackow stitch (Group 2), or a quintuple-pass Krackow stitch (Group 3). Each configuration comprised 10 specimens. All constructs were subjected to a cyclic loading protocol followed by monotonic axial load-to-failure testing, consisting of a 5 N preload, 500 loading cycles between 50 and 200 N at 1 Hz, and final load-to-failure testing performed at a constant failure displacement rate of 20 mm/min. Outcome variables were first cycle elongation, last cycle elongation, cyclic elongation, failure displacement, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness. Groups were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, with Dunn's test and Bonferroni adjustment for post hoc pairwise comparisons; statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

resultsA significant group effect was found for the ultimate load to failure. Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis indicated that Group 1 was superior to Group 2 (p_adj = 0.004) and Group 3 (p_adj = 0.001), with no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (p_adj = 1.000). No differences were found for first-cycle elongation, last-cycle elongation, cyclic elongation, failure displacement, and stiffness.

conclusionWithin the limits of this time-zero bovine patellar tendon model, periosteum-augmented triple-pass Krackow suturing provided the most favorable ultimate load profile, whereas increasing the number of Krackow passes alone did not provide a measurable biomechanical advantage.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionPatellar LigamentPeriosteumSuture TechniquesAnimalsAnterior Cruciate LigamentBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleWeight-BearingACL reconstructionAll-insideAnterior cruciate ligamentBiomechanicsPatellar tendon graft

Identifiers

PMID42286552
PMCPMC13295485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.