Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286547›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Psychosocial predictors of mental well-being in higher education students: a comprehensive approach.

Pedro Alcântara da Silva, Carla Branco, Sibila Marques, João Limão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro Alcântara da SilvaInstitute of Social Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. pedro.alcantara@ics.ulisboa.pt.
Carla BrancoCentre for Psychological Research and Social Intervention (CIS-Iscte), ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sibila MarquesCentre for Psychological Research and Social Intervention (CIS-Iscte), ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
João LimãocE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTime spent in tertiary education can be crucial in establishing practices and attitudes that last a lifetime. Although higher education institutions can be one of the main promoters of health, students seem to be a particularly vulnerable group, exposed to constant pressure for academic results and to various stimuli with consequences for their health. It is common to find psychological distress situations, with high levels of depression, anxiety, stress, and even suicidal ideation. Strategies for preventing and promoting health in higher education need to be based on research on predictors of student well-being. Due to the large number of factors that can have a significant impact on student well-being, it is essential to analyze all of these influences together and identify potential priorities for intervention. In this study, this is done by taking a holistic approach to the various factors at multiple levels of analysis. The aim was to test the differential role of multiple predictors of mental well-being on a representative sample of Portuguese university students, using seven factors: (i) sociodemographic; (ii) health status; (iii) lifestyle choices; (iv) life satisfaction and self-esteem; (v) academic-related aspects; (vi) relationships; and (vii) leisure and cultural activities.

methodsThe research is based on a probabilistic stratified cluster sample representative of the student population of 30 Portuguese public higher education institutions for the 2021/2022 academic year (n = 9,611). Mental well-being was measured using the WHO-5 Well-being Index. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis with seven blocks of predictors was performed to test the differential role of sociodemographic, health status, lifestyle, life satisfaction and self-esteem, academic-related, relationship, and leisure and cultural activity factors. Multiple imputation (15 datasets) was used to handle missing data.

resultsFindings indicate that health, lifestyle, self-esteem, and life satisfaction are most predictive of mental well-being among students, followed by sociodemographic, leisure and cultural activities, academics, and relations. Conversely, lower levels of mental well-being were associated with being female, being younger, and experiencing persistent pain. By taking these multiple factors into account, we can better promote mental health interventions for students in higher education settings.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the need for comprehensive mental health promotion strategies in higher education settings. Interventions should prioritize improving self-esteem, sleep quality, and leisure time, while also addressing the specific needs of more vulnerable groups, such as female and younger students. By adopting a psychosocial approach that considers multiple levels of influence, higher education institutions can play a pivotal role in promoting student mental well-being.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychological Well-BeingStudentsAcademiaAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth StatusHumansLife StyleMalePersonal SatisfactionPortugalSelf ConceptSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesHealthHigher educationPsychosocial factorsStudentsWell-being

Identifiers

PMID42286547
PMCPMC13488587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.