Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286522›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Clinical analysis of prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound findings, and follow-up in 92 Turner mosaic fetuses: a retrospective analysis of 12-year experience.

Xiaojin Luo, Hongyan Niu, Yanli Tang, Jinmao Xu, Fei Zhou, Xiaoyi Cong, Shuangwu Li, Yuanyuan Pei, Liang Chang, Weiqiang Liu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaojin LuoThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Hongyan NiuThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Yanli TangThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Jinmao XuThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Fei ZhouThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Xiaoyi CongThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Shuangwu LiThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Yuanyuan PeiThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China.
Liang ChangState Key Laboratory of Female Fertility Promotion, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. changliangchina@163.com.
Weiqiang LiuThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China. liuwq06@126.com.
Fengxiang WeiThe Genetics Laboratory, Longgang District Matemity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Matemity and child Institute of shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518172, China. weifengxiang1115@outlook.com.

Funding

henzhen Science and Technology Plan Project JCYJ20220530162412029Key Clinical Projects of Peking University Third Hospital BYSYZD2024010Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education BYSYSZKF2023003National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Peking University Third Hospital) NCRC2025B06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study conducted a retrospective analysis on ultrasound findings, karyotype characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and follow-up data for 92 fetuses diagnosed with Turner mosaicism. It provides essential clinical data on the prenatal and postnatal outcomes of these cases.

methodsA comprehensive review and analysis were conducted on 92 cases of Turner mosaic fetuses diagnosed by karyotyping, SNP-array, or FISH at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Shenzhen Longgang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, a tertiary medical center, between January 2013 and September 2025. The analysis focused on maternal demographic data, types and proportions of mosaic karyotypes, ultrasound findings, pregnancy outcomes, and postnatal follow-up data.

resultsOf 12,855 high-risk pregnancies undergoing amniocentesis, 92 Turner mosaic fetuses ( 0.72%, 92/12855) were identified. The majority (65/92, 70.7%) exhibited X-chromosome aneuploidy mosaicism, most commonly 45,X/46,XX (52 cases). Mosaicism involving structural abnormalities of the X chromosome was observed in 27 cases (29.3%), including eight cases of 45,X/46,X, i(X)(q10). Ultrasonography detected abnormalities in 10 fetuses - three with cardiovascular malformations, two with growth restriction, and one with cystic hygroma - while the remaining 82 cases had no abnormal ultrasound findings. Two cases were notable for complex multi-system anomalies: one with 45,X[24]/46,XX[76] presented with coarctation of the aorta, a horseshoe kidney, and increased nuchal translucency (3.2 mm); another with 46,X, i(X)(q10)[66]/46,XX[24] had a ventricular septal defect, left clubfoot, and bilateral ventricular widening. Of the 92 fetuses with Turner mosaicism, 69 pregnancies were terminated and 23 were continued. Among the 23 continuing pregnancies, one resulted in embryonic arrest, one was subsequently terminated, and one delivered preterm at 34 weeks. Twenty infants were live-born and followed up: three showed delayed language and motor development, one had epilepsy, one had hearing loss, and one exhibited short stature with dry skin. Notably, the abnormal mosaic ratio in all cases with postnatal findings ranged from 20% to 30%.

conclusionThe prenatal phenotype of Turner mosaicism is largely determined by the proportion of abnormal cells and the tissues involved. Clinical decisions should caution against termination for mosaic ratio below 30%, as cases under 10% typically have favorable outcomes. Although prenatal ultrasound findings for Turner mosaicism lack specificity, they may be closely associated with cardiovascular abnormalities and intrauterine growth restriction. After birth, it is crucial to conduct close postnatal monitoring of neurodevelopment for these children.

Indexed as

MosaicismPrenatal DiagnosisTurner SyndromeUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultAmniocentesisChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaryotypingPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesPrenatal diagnosisTurner mosaicultrasound findings

Identifiers

PMID42286522
PMCPMC13483155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.