ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Operationalizing a minimal-metric school screening pathway: using non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent as a first-stage triage metric for hyperopia-reserve insufficiency in Chinese schoolchildren.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSchool-based myopia screening commonly relies on non-cycloplegic refraction because cycloplegic refraction is difficult to implement universally at scale. This study evaluated whether non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent (NC-SE) could serve as a low-burden first-stage triage metric to identify children who warrant cycloplegic assessment for possible hyperopia reserve insufficiency (HRI).
methodsThis cross-sectional school-based study included 1,650 children aged 6-15 years from Zengcheng District, Guangzhou, China. All participants underwent non-cycloplegic autorefraction, UCVA assessment, and cycloplegic autorefraction. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent (Cyclo-SE) was used as the reference standard for defining HRI, cycloplegic myopia, and pseudomyopia. HRI was operationally defined as preserved UCVA with low cycloplegic hyperopic reserve: Cyclo-SE from 0 to + 1.25 D in children aged 6-8 years and from 0 to + 1.00 D in children aged 9-15 years. Diagnostic performance of NC-SE for identifying HRI was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsThe prevalence of HRI was 14.1%, 10.5%, and 3.9% in the 6-8, 9-11, and 12-15-year-old groups, respectively. Correlation between NC-SE and Cyclo-SE strengthened with age (Spearman's rho: 0.641, 0.675, and 0.813; all p < 0.001). For detecting HRI, NC-SE achieved an AUC of 0.661 (95% CI: 0.618-0.704). A pragmatic cutoff of -0.50 D yielded a sensitivity of 0.824 (95% CI: 0.765-0.870), specificity of 0.550 (95% CI: 0.524-0.575), PPV of 20.5% (95% CI: 17.9-23.4), and NPV of 95.7% (95% CI: 94.1-96.9). Among children with normal visual acuity, 24.1% had pseudomyopia.
conclusionNC-SE may serve as a low-burden first-stage triage metric in school-based screening to identify children who warrant cycloplegic assessment for possible HRI. However, its moderate AUC and low PPV indicate that NC-SE should not be interpreted as a stand-alone diagnostic test. Cycloplegic refraction remains necessary for confirming hyperopic reserve status. Further longitudinal studies incorporating axial length, accommodative measurements, and external validation are needed to determine its prognostic value for incident myopia. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.