Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286494›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Prevalence and determinants of low-birth-weight deliveries at four district hospitals in Kigali, Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.

Gashaija Absolomon, Richard Kalisa, Jeanine Condo, Felix K Rubuga, Marie Josée Mwiseneza, Candide Mugeni Girimpundu, Japhet Ishimwe, Solange Nikwigize, Patricia Moreland, Etienne Nsereko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gashaija AbsolomonCenter for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building in Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda. absolomonrwanda@gmail.com.
Richard KalisaDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jeanine CondoCenter for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building in Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Felix K RubugaCenter for Impact, Innovation and Capacity Building in Health Information Systems and Nutrition (CIIC-HIN), Kigali, Rwanda.
Marie Josée MwisenezaDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Candide Mugeni GirimpunduDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Japhet IshimweDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Solange NikwigizeDepartment of Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Patricia MorelandCarter Center for Global Health and Social Responsibility, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Etienne NserekoDepartment of Anaesthesia, School of Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a significant public health concern, particularly in developing countries, because it is associated with increased neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. In Rwanda, LBW remains a critical issue affecting the overall health and development of children. Understanding the factors contributing to LBW is essential for designing effective interventions to reduce its prevalence and improve maternal and child health outcomes. We aimed to determine the prevalence and determinants of LBW among neonates delivered at four district hospitals in the City of Kigali Province, Rwanda.

methodsA hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among neonates delivered at three public and one private district hospital located in the City of Kigali from November 2023 to February 2024. All available neonatal medical records that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed using retrospective chart review approach. Data analysis was performed via STATA version 17 to conduct descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression to determine the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and corresponding P-values for the determinants of LBW.

resultsThe prevalence of LBW was 8.2% (95% CI: 7.6-8.8; n = 453/5520). Significant determinants included HIV-positive status (AOR = 2.07, 95% CI [1.01-4.22], p = 0.046), indicating more than twice the odds of delivering an LBW infant compared to HIV-negative mothers; female neonates (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI [1.21-1.89], p < 0.001); preeclampsia/eclampsia (AOR = 4.46, 95% CI [2.32-8.58], p < 0.001); and hospitalization during pregnancy (AOR = 4.34, 95% CI [2.20-8.56], p < 0.001). Preterm birth (< 38 weeks gestation) was the strongest determinant (AOR = 16.85, 95% CI [13.19-21.52], p < 0.001).

conclusionThe prevalence of LBW among neonates in Kigali was 8.2%. Maternal HIV-positive status, female child sex, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and prior admission during current pregnancy were key determinants of LBW. Strengthening antenatal care and targeted maternal health programs, especially for teenage mothers, HIV-positive pregnant women, and women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, can help address these factors and reduce LBW rates in Rwanda.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHospitals, DistrictHumansInfant, NewbornMalePre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsRwandaYoung AdultDeterminantsDistrict hospitalsLow birth weightNeonatesRwanda

Identifiers

PMID42286494
PMCPMC13508548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.