ArticleBMC genomics2026
Two Australian genome assemblies expand the genomic blueprint of giant kelp.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera (order Laminariales), occurs across the temperate coasts of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres and is at high risk from ocean warming. Few giant kelp forests remain across the Southeast Australian shelf, and some sites are currently under active restoration. Genomic resources can greatly aid in the conservation of remnant populations and enhance restoration efforts. Reference genomes are a fundamental resource as they are either prerequisites for, or substantially improve, many analyses used in conservation genomics. A single reference genome is available for giant kelp, assembled from a Californian haploid specimen. However, increasing evidence of genetic divergence between Northern and Southern Hemisphere populations highlights the need for regionally representative reference genomes.
resultsWe present two genome assemblies from the vegetative tissue (diploid sporophyte) of Australian giant kelp specimens. We performed de novo genome assembly using long-read sequencing (PacBio HiFi and ONT R10.4 Simplex) and used the ONT reads for scaffolding, assembling 98-99% of the genomes into 35 pseudo-chromosomes. Genome sizes ranged from 528 to 534 Mbp, with BUSCO completeness of 96-97% and QV scores of 51-52. Functional annotation identified 17,330 - 17,832 genes in the Australian assemblies. Genomic divergence between Australian and Californian genomes was seven-fold greater than between Australian genomes (1.5% vs. 0.2%), supporting a northeast-southwest Pacific genetic divergence. Differences in gene ontology enrichment patterns were also observed between Australian and Californian genomes, reflected by differing patterns of enrichment in gene ontologies linked to energy metabolism, proteostasis and stress responses.
conclusionsThese two new genome assemblies will serve as valuable resources for ongoing research into Australian giant kelp genetics, while providing the basis for genomics-guided conservation and restoration of remnant giant kelp forests in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.