ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Impact of RAS inhibitors on 2-year mortality and disease progression in chronic mitral regurgitation.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03484806 (China Registry and Cohort Study of Valvular Heart Disease in Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
China Registry and Cohort Study of Valvular Heart Disease in Adults
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, and the role of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with MR remains uncertain. This study evaluated the association between RASI use patterns and 2-year all-cause mortality and disease progression in patients with primary MR (PMR) and secondary MR (SMR).
methodsThis registry-based study included 3,297 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic MR from the China Valvular Heart Disease registry, including 955 with PMR and 2,342 with SMR. RASI use was assessed at baseline and during follow-up, and patients were categorized as always users, never users, or inconsistent users. The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was change in MR severity. Associations between RASI use and outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox regression, propensity-score matching, and time-varying Cox analyses.
resultsConsistent RASI use was associated with lower 2-year all-cause mortality in both PMR and SMR. In multivariable Cox regression, never users had higher mortality risk than always users in both cohorts (PMR: HR 5.40, 95% CI 1.58-18.47, P = 0.007; SMR: HR 5.09, 95% CI 2.85-9.09, P < 0.001). Inconsistent users also had higher mortality risk than always users (PMR: HR 7.56, 95% CI 2.25-25.37, P = 0.001; SMR: HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.85-5.84, P < 0.001). Propensity-score-matched analyses showed broadly consistent results. Time-varying Cox analyses demonstrated directionally consistent associations in the overall cohort and SMR during selected follow-up intervals, whereas in PMR the interval-specific estimates were less stable and did not reach statistical significance. Consistent RASI use was also associated with improvement in MR severity, particularly in SMR and in patients without guideline-based indications for valvular intervention.
conclusionsIn patients with moderate-to-severe chronic MR, consistent RASI use was associated with lower 2-year all-cause mortality and improvement in MR severity. These findings suggest that RASI therapy may have a role in optimized medical management for selected patients with chronic MR, particularly those with SMR or impaired/borderline LV function. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm whether RASI directly improves survival or delays MR progression.
trial registrationThis study utilized data from the China Valvular Heart Disease (China-VHD) registry (NCT03484806).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.