Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286453›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026

Septic shock in the operating room immediately after surgery: a case requiring differentiation from drug-induced anaphylaxis.

Masaki Orihara, Tomonori Takazawa, Chigusa Nakasone, Tadanao Hiroki, Tatsuo Horiuchi, Kazuhiro Nagumo, Shigeru Saito

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masaki OriharaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan. orihara@gunma-u.ac.jp.
Tomonori TakazawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan.
Chigusa NakasoneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Tadanao HirokiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Isesaki Municipal Hospital, 12-1 Tsunatorihon-Machi, Isesaki, Gunma, 372-0817, Japan.
Tatsuo HoriuchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Kazuhiro NagumoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
Shigeru SaitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI 19K18286; 24K12087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few reported cases of sepsis becoming apparent in the operating room, and even fewer where septic shock was misdiagnosed as anaphylaxis. Here, we report a case of septic shock occurring during extubation immediately after elective abdominal surgery, highlighting the need to differentiate septic shock from drug-induced anaphylaxis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old woman underwent elective extended left hepatic lobectomy under combined general and epidural anesthesia. Although cholangitis was suspected before surgery, her symptoms improved with treatment, allowing the planned procedure to proceed. Shortly after administration of sugammadex during extubation, she developed severe hypotension and generalized erythema, raising the suspicion of anaphylaxis. However, laboratory findings later revealed elevated procalcitonin and positive blood cultures for Klebsiella pneumoniae, consistent with septic shock. The patient recovered after treatment for sepsis, and was discharged without complications. Serum tryptase and histamine levels were not elevated, and subsequent skin tests for suspected anaphylaxis-inducing drugs were negative. She later uneventfully underwent another surgery using the same anesthetic agents.

conclusionsWe report a case that initially mimicked drug-induced anaphylaxis, but was ultimately diagnosed as septic shock. This serves as a crucial reminder for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for septic shock in the perioperative setting, even when the initial presentation strongly suggests an allergic reaction.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisPostoperative ComplicationsShock, SepticAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansOperating RoomsAnaphylaxisCase reportPerioperativeSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID42286453
PMCPMC13488222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.