Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
A latent class analysis of clinical complexity: Secondary analysis of the collaboration leading to addiction treatment and recovery from other stresses (CLARO) randomized trial.
Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsIndividuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently present with co-occurring mental health conditions such as depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), along with other mental health substance use disorders, physical health conditions and social determinants that together comprise 'clinical complexity.' Collaborative care (CC), a primary care-based behavioral health integration model, aims to improve outcomes through coordinated, patient-centered treatment. This study examined heterogeneity in baseline clinical complexity among participants in the CLARO (Collaboration Leading to Addiction Treatment and Recovery from Other Stresses) trial and assessed whether the effects of CC versus enhanced usual care (EUC) differed across clinical complexity groups.
methodsSecondary analysis of CLARO, a pragmatic randomized clinical trial (n = 797) of CC versus EUC for adults with OUD and depression and/or PTSD, conducted in 18 low-resourced primary care clinics in New Mexico and California, USA. Latent class analysis of baseline data identified subgroups defined by mental health and substance use as the main characteristics along with physical health and social challenges. Six-month treatment effects were estimated using one-step models that jointly estimated latent class membership and class-specific outcomes, incorporating class × treatment interactions. Outcomes included depression symptom severity, PTSD symptom severity, and buprenorphine utilization and prescribing duration.
resultsThree subgroups were identified: (1) low complexity (43%), with relative clinical and social stability; (2) mental health complexity (34%), with high psychiatric symptoms but lower substance use and moderate social adversity; and (3) high dual complexity (23%). Compared with EUC, CC was associated with lower depression severity at follow-up for the low-complexity class, but not for other classes. CC and EUC did not differ statistically significantly with respect to PTSD outcomes in any class. Buprenorphine utilization and prescribing duration outcomes were similar across CC and EUC treatment arms.
conclusionsThe effects of collaborative care may vary according to patients' baseline clinical complexity. Collaborative care appears to be associated with more favorable depression outcomes than enhanced usual care among participants with lower clinical complexity but not among those with higher clinical complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.