Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286418›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Ruminal archaea and bacteria metatranscriptomic responses to supplementation in steers fed low-quality forage.

Alyson B Fontenot, Laura Z Holland, Jodi R Cox, Taylor A Falk, Sapna Chitlapilly-Dass, Matthew R Dunn, Brigid R Arciero, Lauren E Fitch, Tryon A Wickersham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alyson B FontenotDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, United States.
Laura Z HollandArkea Bio Corp, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States.
Jodi R CoxDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, United States.
Taylor A FalkArkea Bio Corp, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States.
Sapna Chitlapilly-DassDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, United States.
Matthew R DunnArkea Bio Corp, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States.
Brigid R ArcieroArkea Bio Corp, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States.
Lauren E FitchArkea Bio Corp, Charlestown, MA, 02129, United States.
Tryon A WickershamDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-4152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A basal diet of low-quality forage (LQF) results in decreased forage utilization and animal performance. Protein and starch supplementation can ameliorate these effects by providing additional nitrogen and energy to ruminal microbes. However, the effect of protein and starch supplementation on ruminal microbial gene expression, specifically pathways involved in methanogenesis, is not well-documented. We aimed to evaluate the effect of supplement composition on ruminal microbial gene expression before and after supplementation in steers consuming a basal diet of LQF. Five ruminally-cannulated Angus steers (BW 375 ± 45 kg) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square and fed a basal diet of King Ranch Bluestem Hay (3.5% CP, 73% NDF), and one of four isonitrogenous (130 mg nitrogen/kg BW) supplements. Ruminal samples collected from the steers provided the two most divergent supplements, 2% starch (43% CP; 100% soybean meal) and 56% starch (21% CP; 78% corn, 19% soybean meal, 2.4% urea) were used for metatranscriptomic analysis. Samples were collected via cannula prior to and 4 h post-supplementation; total RNA was sequenced. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified and functionally annotated; pathway enrichment analysis was completed. Sampling time exerted a greater effect than starch concentration (∼78 vs. 17% in both archaea and bacteria). All methanogenesis pathways were differentially regulated by time (P < 0.05) with upregulated genes primarily expressed by Thermoplasmata and downregulated genes primarily expressed by Methanobrevibacter. Acetoclastic and methylotrophic methanogenesis pathways were differentially regulated by starch supplementation (P < 0.05) with upregulated genes primarily expressed by Thermoplasmatales and downregulated genes primarily expressed by Methanomethylophilus alvus. The majority of bacterial DEG were expressed by Clostridia, but unclassified Bacteroidetes was the predominant bacteria responsible for expression of carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes). Time relative to feeding, rather than starch supplementation, resulted in a greater number of bacterial CAZymes expressed. Supplement composition elicited changes in the taxa involved in methanogenesis and carbohydrate metabolism, suggesting the potential for effects on CH4 emissions. Further research is needed to directly quantify CH4 emissions in response to supplementation to potentially optimize supplementation strategies and improve sustainability of beef cattle production.

Indexed as

Animal FeedArchaeaBacteriaRumenTranscriptomeAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMaleStarchStarcharchaeabeef cattlelow-quality foragemetatranscriptomicsrumensupplementation

Identifiers

PMID42286418
PMCPMC13317134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.