ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
A damage-aware NGS workflow for conservative species identification from ultra-degraded DNA.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Species identification from highly degraded DNA remains a major challenge across ecology, conservation genetics, wildlife forensics, and museum science, where samples are often scarce, contaminated, and embedded in complex matrices. Under these conditions, standard reference-based and metagenomic classifiers are prone to false-positive assignments, particularly when ultra-fragmented DNA and conserved genomic regions are not explicitly accounted for. Here, we present a damage-aware next-generation sequencing (NGS) workflow for conservative species identification from minute quantities of highly degraded DNA, designed to minimize misclassification in low-input and damage-rich datasets. The workflow integrates micro-sampling, half-uracil-DNA-glycosylase (half-UDG) library preparation, PCR duplicate removal, multi-genome mapping against a curated reference panel, and a post-mapping read-ubiquity classifier that distinguishes species-specific reads from those shared across conserved loci. Using collagen-rich substrates as a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated accurate species attribution from samples as small as 1 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.