ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Integrating environmental exposure assessment into maternal and neonatal care: a practical mini-review.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental exposure assessment remains under-integrated in maternal and neonatal care despite growing evidence that pregnancy, fetal development, and early neonatal life are highly sensitive periods during which environmental exposures may influence immediate and longer-term health. This narrative mini-review highlights the clinical relevance of environmental exposures in maternal and neonatal practice, outlines why exposure assessment remains underused in routine care, and proposes a pragmatic framework for integration. Key barriers include limited clinician training, unclear referral pathways, and the perception that environmental risks are difficult to assess and interpret in clinical settings. A targeted approach may be most appropriate in high-risk pregnancies, unexplained adverse outcomes, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth, and medically vulnerable neonates. A practical framework based on recognizing higher-risk situations, obtaining a focused exposure history, and acting through counseling, referral, or selective testing is proposed to help bring environmental health closer to routine maternal and neonatal care. What is Known? • Pregnancy, fetal development, and early neonatal life are highly sensitive periods during which environmental exposures may influence health and development. • Environmental exposure assessment remains underused in routine maternal and neonatal care because of limited clinician training, unclear referral pathways, and uncertainty about how to act on exposure concerns. What is New? • This narrative mini-review proposes a practical framework for integrating environmental exposure assessment intomaternal and neonatal care through focused history taking, counseling, referral, and selective testing when appropriate. • A practical screening table is provided with example exposure questions, red flags, and suggested clinical actions to support real-world clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42286274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.