ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Intraoperative functional brain mapping for glioma surgery: a comprehensive review of the University of California San Francisco mapping protocol.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntraoperative functional brain mapping is an essential and intricate technique in modern-day glioma surgery. This article is not a review of the literature but of the technical protocol at our institution that has evolved over the recent decades to the current time and is intended to highlight details that enable us to perform maximal safe resection of gliomas.
methodsPrior to surgery, anatomical and functional imaging protocols are obtained to determine the tumor to be resected within its anatomical and functional environment. Preoperative assessments are used to determine which mapping procedures and tasks are most appropriate. Cortical and subcortical motor and language mapping using low and high frequency stimulation paradigms are applied when appropriate during resection. Methods to interpret findings and troubleshoot issues are reviewed herein.
resultsAll preoperative imaging including magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography of functional cortex, and diffusion tensor imaging of subcortical tracts are uploaded into the neuronavigation station and used throughout surgery for guidance. The decision to continue with tumor resection is based on constant feedback from the mapping paradigms as functional pathways are approached in real time. Both awake and asleep anesthesia regimens are utilized depending on the type of testing required to assess and preserve functional areas during tumor resection. Postoperatively, deficits are assessed using MRI along with clinical exam to predict whether they will be temporary or permanent.
conclusionThe standard of care for all gliomas is maximal safe resection. In this review, we describe brain mapping methods that have been developed, refined, and utilized over decades at a single institution, which have allowed us to achieve this goal safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.