ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated error localisation and correction techniques for deep-learning-based segmentation of 3D MRI sequences based on feature-derived-region aggregation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has become a key tool in musculoskeletal imaging, offering substantial reductions in processing time. However, concerns about reliability often necessitate manual inspection and correction. We present a method that leverages network-derived uncertainty to automatically identify and localise segmentation errors, reducing the need for exhaustive manual review. A 3D nnU-Net was trained on delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of hip cartilage. Voxel-wise uncertainty scores, computed from the SoftMax outputs of ensembled sub-networks, were aggregated over feature-based supervoxels. Each region was then evaluated for its potential impact on clinically relevant metrics, generating sensitivity scores. A logistic model combined these with uncertainty data to assign risk scores, guiding attention to areas most likely to affect clinical metrics during the initial correction steps. Using these risk scores, guided supervoxel correction of just 50 supervoxels reduced the mean absolute relative error by 2.1-fold. Guided manual correction within these regions achieved a 3.5-fold reduction, an approximate 62% supervoxel correction efficiency. Correcting the top 10 regions yielded up to 88% efficiency. This approach serves as a proof-of-concept for targeted correction in hip MRI, enhancing the clinical utility of CNN-based segmentation by demonstrating that 3D feature-derived uncertainty aggregation has the potential to reduce correction burden compared to traditional 2D methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.