ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
A new AI assisted approach aligns data standards and accelerates interoperability in biomedical research.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking the Power of Data Harmonization in Environmental Health Sciences: A Comprehensive Exploration of Significance, Use Cases, and Recommendations for Standardization Efforts.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Streamline automated biomedical discoveries with agentic bioinformatics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We demonstrate how Large Language Models (LLMs) accelerate biomedical data harmonization through automated Common Data Element (CDE) generation. We processed 31 datasets including clinical taxonomies and research data dictionaries through OpenAI's Generative Pre-trained Transformer - 4 (API Model gpt-4-0613), generating comprehensive metadata for each element using a template-based system. Subject-matter experts validated outputs, finding 94% of generated metadata fields required no revision overall, with an unweighted accuracy of 83.8%, unweighted, for semi-structured sources. Dramatically faster than manual approaches. Our system uses ElasticSearch with weighted field matching to identify semantic equivalences between variables, avoiding duplicate CDEs while building a standardized repository. Testing with Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and Global Parkinson's Genetic Program (GP2) datasets showed 32.4% of previously unseen headers successfully mapped to our CDEs, with interoperability scores averaging 53.8/100 based on matching, completeness, and compliance metrics. This approach automates the most tedious aspects of data integration, reducing barriers to cross-study collaboration in biomedical research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.