ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Surgical society committee members disclosure of conflict of interest: show me the money.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisclosure of conflict of interest (COI) is important for surgical societies to minimize bias. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) requires committee members to disclose potential COI to promote full transparency. This study investigates compliance with this requirement and quantifies the actual dollar amounts that ineligible companies, collectively "industry", give to committee members.
methodsAll SAGES committee members were queried in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database (OPD). The query results for 2023 and 2024 were compared to the actual self-reported disclosure statements submitted to SAGES in the spring of 2025. Due to the nature of the database, only US-based physicians were included. Only payments of $500 or more were recorded. Only committees whose rosters were available online were utilized. Incorrect disclosure was defined as a mismatch between the OPD and the member's disclosure.
resultsThere were 930 individual committee members and 185 were excluded by OPD. Only 51% (382/745) of OPD queries matched disclosures. Correct disclosure occurred in 104/467 who had disclosable COI. Industry paid over $18,000,000 to committee members; one-third came from Intuitive Surgical. Members who received payments received an average of $38,992. The largest total amount to one individual was over $2,500,000. There was no difference in average payments received or appropriate disclosure rate by committee members on one committee versus those on multiple committees. Chair/co-chairs (n = 114) did not differ from other members (n = 631) in percent of appropriate disclosures (59 vs. 50%). However, chairs/co-chairs did receive larger payments ($37,501 vs. $22,021; p < 0.0035).
conclusionsSAGES has set policies for disclosing COI. Enforcement of these policies is challenging. Many committee members receive large payments from industry; thus the actual dollar amount should also be reported. Full and accurate reporting will allow for full transparency and reduce perception of bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42286179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.