Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286154›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

An autonomous AI agent for knowledge and data cooperation in ED clinical decision support.

Peiyuan Lai, Zhenwei Huang, Xinhui Huang, Danyuan Xu, Cheng Li, Zenghui Wang, Huantao Cai, Xing Li, Jin Wu, Changdong Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peiyuan Lai *School of Electronics and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenwei Huang *School of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinhui HuangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Danyuan XuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zenghui WangGuangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Matching for Technology Commercialization, Guangzhou, China.
Huantao CaiGuangdong Provincial Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Matching for Technology Commercialization, Guangzhou, China.
Xing LiThe State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Jin WuSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Changdong WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. wangchd3@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Qingyun DaiSchool of Electronics and Information, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Li LiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao YuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. yut@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No.2024YFA1011900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical knowledge accumulation and clinical practice form a closed loop, yet enabling effective cooperation between the two elements, namely autonomously distilling updated knowledge from dynamic data to guide practice, remains challenging, especially in the emergency department (ED). To overcome this, we developed an autonomous AI agent that integrates established medical knowledge graphs with dynamic clinical data into a hybrid graph of over 800,000 nodes. Using large language models (LLMs) for knowledge extraction and semantic mapping, the system dynamically selects the most relevant graph to power specialized tools for ED recognition, prediction, and decision-making. The agent achieves average improvements over state-of-the-art baselines of 23.13% in ED triage, 13.05% in drug-drug interaction detection, 1.58% in readmission prediction, and 5.47% in medication recommendation, demonstrating superior performance across all task categories. This demonstrates an effective framework for synergizing established medical knowledge and dynamic clinical data in emergency care.

Identifiers

PMID42286154
PMCPMC13646254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.