ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
An autonomous AI agent for knowledge and data cooperation in ED clinical decision support.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PAUSE-Agents: A Clinician-in-the-Loop Multi-Agent AI Pipeline for ICU-to-Ward Handoff Briefs.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical knowledge accumulation and clinical practice form a closed loop, yet enabling effective cooperation between the two elements, namely autonomously distilling updated knowledge from dynamic data to guide practice, remains challenging, especially in the emergency department (ED). To overcome this, we developed an autonomous AI agent that integrates established medical knowledge graphs with dynamic clinical data into a hybrid graph of over 800,000 nodes. Using large language models (LLMs) for knowledge extraction and semantic mapping, the system dynamically selects the most relevant graph to power specialized tools for ED recognition, prediction, and decision-making. The agent achieves average improvements over state-of-the-art baselines of 23.13% in ED triage, 13.05% in drug-drug interaction detection, 1.58% in readmission prediction, and 5.47% in medication recommendation, demonstrating superior performance across all task categories. This demonstrates an effective framework for synergizing established medical knowledge and dynamic clinical data in emergency care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.