ArticleScientific reports2026
A customized AI-based machine learning model for evaluating participants' activities under a workshop setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human action recognition (HAR) in the workshop-style environment poses unique challenges due to class imbalance, fused action boundaries, and context dependence. This study proposes a multi-stage fine-tuning supervised framework for workshop-style HAR based on a 3D CNN, supplemented by an unsupervised post-assessment. A total of 208 clips (100 frames per clip) from two internal and two external datasets were used, along with 183 clips generated from 152 videos in a subset of the public UCF101 dataset for an add-on supplementary analysis. An I3D-ResNet50 (I3D_R50) backbone was used to examine a pilot model for domain adaptation and subsequently optimized for cross-context generalization. In Study 1, the I3D_R50 model with a customized 57-class prediction head was trained on the internal dataset, achieving a solid class- and cluster-level performance, however, spurious co-activations and limited separation among similar actions were observed. Study 2 refined sample allocation and data augmentation, and applied threshold tuning to evaluate within-context adaptation (Test 1) and cross-context generalization (Test 2). Multi-level analyses (class-, clip-, cluster-, and person-level) revealed moderate co-activation and semantic fusion within context, whereas cross-context generalization suffered from structure over-merging and semantic drift. As a post-assessment, Study 3 provided supplementary evidence that the model captured certain semantic co-occurrence relationships, although its performance remained constrained by limited IGE-TREE specific training samples and fine-grained behavioral categories. Limitations include insufficient samples, blurred temporal sequence, and context dependency. Future work could explore domain-adversarial alignment, pose-guided normalization, and temporal contrastive modeling, and selective merging of semantically similar actions to enhance semantic disentanglement and generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.