ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparing trapezoidal and circular configurations to evaluate the impact of shell geometry on thermal energy storage performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research investigates the influence of shell and inner tube geometry modifications on the thermal performance of latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) systems employing phase change materials (PCMs), aiming to overcome the low thermal conductivity and weak melting zones commonly observed in conventional configurations. Several shell-and-tube configurations with circular, rectangular, and trapezoidal geometries were investigated numerically. The novelty of the present study lies in the combined optimization of both shell and inner tube trapezoidal geometries to enhance natural convection and improve heat distribution inside the PCM domain. Numerical simulations evaluate melting time, enhancement ratio, energy storage density, and mean power for each case. Results indicate that the conventional Circle-Circle configuration has the longest complete melting time (CMT) of 5440 s. Fully trapezoidal shell-and-tube designs significantly enhance heat transfer, with Trapezoidal-Trapezoidal 03 achieving a remarkable reduction of 23.53%, lowering the CMT to 4160 s. The enhancement ratio analysis shows that Trapezoidal-Trapezoidal 03 achieves a maximum improvement of 18%, whereas other trapezoidal configurations attain enhancements between 4% and 13%. The superior performance of trapezoidal geometries is mainly attributed to improved heat distribution toward the lower PCM region, reduced thermal dead zones, and stronger natural convection circulation. Regarding energy performance, Trapezoidal-Trapezoidal 03 achieves a mean power of 735 W, while Circle-Trapezoidal 01 and 02 exhibit the highest energy storage densities of 206.24 and 207.88 kJ/kg, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the optimal configuration depends on the targeted application, whether prioritizing rapid melting or higher energy storage density. The present results may contribute to the design of more efficient thermal energy storage systems for solar thermal and industrial waste heat recovery applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.