ArticleScientific reports2026
An exploratory multimodal pipeline for recurrence prediction in CRC with XELOX therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer(CRC) recurrence remains a challenge despite curative surgery and adjuvant therapy. Integrating clinicopathological and liquid biopsy data may improve risk stratification, but evidence in small‑sample settings is lacking. This exploratory study assessed the feasibility of a multimodal machine learning pipeline for recurrence prediction in a well‑defined XELOX‑treated cohort. We analyzed 86 CRC patients(17 recurrences) receiving uniform XELOX adjuvant therapy. A three‑step pipeline was applied: (1) LASSO regression for coarse variable selection (10‑fold cross‑validation); (2) gradient boosting machine and random forest was then employed for further variable refinement; (3) The common variables selected by both methods was then used for a Firth penalized logistic regression model. The final model performance was evaluated using bootstrap‑corrected AUC, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis(DCA). The intersection of GBM and RF selected four predictors: ctDNA positivity, perineural invasion, high‑grade tumor budding, and T stage (T5 vs. T1-4). The final Firth model yielded an optimism‑corrected AUC of 0.695(95% bootstrap CI: 0.58-0.81). Wide confidence intervals (e.g., ctDNA OR = 3.95; 95% CI: 0.83-8.61) and an unexpected coefficient direction for T stage indicated statistical instability due to the limited event count. Although Calibration showed systematic deviations, DCA suggested potential net benefit for thresholds 0.10-0.30. This exploratory study demonstrates the feasibility of a multimodal machine learning pipeline for recurrence prediction in a small CRC cohort. All findings are hypothesis‑generating, and the model is not clinically ready. External validation in larger prospective cohorts is required before any clinical application can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.