ArticleScientific reports2026
Accurate surgery time prediction (ASTP) strategy based on artificial intelligence techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate timing prediction of surgery is essential for efficient operating room scheduling and ensuring patient care. This study proposes a two-layered Accurate Surgical Time Prediction (ASTP) framework. The first layer combines feature importance and advanced machine learning models to estimate surgical time. After preprocessing, two complementary interpretable AI methods were used: Long Short Term Memory with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values and Random Forest permutation importance, to determine the importance of features. In the second layer, subsets of features (TOP-K) were progressively evaluated using HGBR and compared with multiple models: artificial neural networks (ANNs) and recurrent models (Long Short Term Memory, Gated Recurrent Unit, and hybrid Long Short-Term Memory + Gated Recurrent Unit). The proposed framework was evaluated on two datasets: a real-world dataset from an operating room at Nile Hospital and a public dataset from the Medical Informatics Operating Room Vitals and Events Repository (MOVER). In the Nile Hospital dataset, the results show that the Histogram Gradient Boosting Regression (HGBR) approach achieves the best balance, with a Mean Absolute Error of 8.89 min, Root Mean Square Error of 19.5 min, and R-squared of 0.26 using only four features, outperforming other methods. On the MOVER dataset, HGBR also demonstrated the strongest overall predictive behavior, achieving its best numerical result at TOP-12 and best subset at TOP-7, which preserved near-optimal performance with reduced input complexity. The proposed ASTP framework provides an interpretable and resource-efficient solution for surgical time prediction, supporting more intelligent operating room scheduling and facilitating future integration into hospital decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.