ArticleScientific reports2026
Fast surface reconstruction of human brain MRI: benchmarking deep-learning based morphometry tools.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time efficient and reliable pipelines for quantitative evaluation of structural brain MRI are essential to utilize the potential of morphometry tools for large scale research projects as well as to pave the path towards future clinical applications. In our work, we have explored this idea by evaluating three deep learning models for brain segmentation and cortex parcellation (DeepSCAN, FastSurferCNN and QuickNAT) as input for an 11-min surface reconstruction pipeline adapted from the well studied open source software package FreeSurfer. Performance was assessed using both, large publicly available human MRI datasets and a synthetic dataset with known metrics and reference surfaces. Evaluation criteria included closeness to the surface reconstruction by FreeSurfer's full recon-all pipeline, reproducibility within same-session rescans, performance stability across a wide age range, sensitivity to variations of the grey-white contrast in the MRI and accuracy regarding metrics of synthetic surfaces. Metrics derived from the DeepSCAN-based pipeline demonstrated the highest agreement with FreeSurfer in the human data and the greatest fidelity to the expected metrics in the synthetic dataset. Our findings identify the DeepSCAN-based surface reconstruction pipeline as a rapid, yet reliable alternative to established research-grade structural MRI processing. Time expenditure and reliability suggest it is suitable for research applications with high-throughput requirements. This is an essential first step towards necessary subsequent studies aimed at evaluating robustness, pathological variability, and utility in the context of clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.