Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286064›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

HOA-OBL: hybrid opposition-based hippopotamus optimization framework for efficient UAV task allocation.

G Keerthana, R Padmanaban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G KeerthanaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, India.
R PadmanabanSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, India. padmanaban.r@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are widely deployed in public and civic areas, especially in environments where human presence is restricted due to safety concerns. UAVs play a vital role in maximizing resource utilization and minimizing operational redundancy in applications such as disaster recovery, infrastructure inspection, and surveillance. However, the conventional task-allocation frameworks often suffer from suboptimal resource utilization and limited adaptability in dynamic operational environments. To resolve these problems, this paper presents a hybrid opposition based Hippopotamus Optimization (HOA-OBL) algorithm framework for efficient UAV task allocation optimization. Particularly, Hippopotamus Optimization Algorithm (HOA) is one of the widely known population-based algorithms, motivated by the inherent behavior of hippopotamuses, but it has a limitation of local optima in certain iterations. To enhance the exploration, the Opposition-Based Learning (OBL) is integrated with HOA to explore the search space to prevent it from converging too early to local optima. We performed simulation experiments in dynamic environments with 20 UAVs and 100 tasks. The experimental results imply that the proposed framework achieves reductions of about 17% to 33% in energy consumption and performance enhancements of about 33% to 50% in load balancing when compared with existing models such as HOA, GA, PSO, and GWO. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework provides a more balanced and scalable approach to task assignment to UAVs, thereby improving efficiency and consistency in real-world UAV missions.

Indexed as

Hippopotamus optimizationLoad balancingOpposition-based learningTask allocationUnmanned aerial vehicles

Identifiers

PMID42286064
PMCPMC13518960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.