ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence-powered cloud security strategies for protecting critical clinical operations in healthcare environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing use of cloud computing in hospitals, telemedicine, the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) and real-time patient monitoring has made for an increasing trend of artificial intelligence-driven cloud security in hospitals. The growing reliance on distributed healthcare clouds layers the cyber-attack surface, however, with critical clinical operations now at risk from ransomware attacks, insider threats, API exploitation, and advanced persistent attacks. This research study introduces a novel AI-integrated cloud security framework tailored for safeguarding mission critical applications in the healthcare sector featuring an intelligent threat detection component, a probabilistic risk evaluation system, and an adaptive response orchestration system. The proposed architecture is built-in by using telemetry normalization, probabilistic behaviour modelling, deep autoencoders for anomaly detection, Bayesian approach for threat probability estimation, multi-objective risk scoring and reinforcement learning for adaptive mitigation. An experimental validation was performed with the CICIDS2017 dataset including around two million samples of network traffic data across various attack categories. The experimental results show that excellent performances have been achieved with an accuracy of 0.96, precision of 0.95, recall of 0.94, F1score of 0.95 and AUC of 0.98 with low latency of around 26 ms and reduced false positive rate of 0.03. A comparative analysis against the current cloud security methods also confirms the effectiveness of the proposed framework in delivering better operational security, response time and the availability of clinical services, providing the continuous clinical service that healthcare organizations require. The research showcases how incorporating AI with responsive cloud security mechanisms can offer a scalable and resilient defense against today's healthcare cloud infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.