ArticleScientific reports2026
Real-world and computational identification of herbal candidates associated with adverse event patterns in glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy for obesity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for obesity management; however, adverse events (AEs) remain a clinical concern. This study presents a computational pharmacovigilance framework integrating real-world safety data with graph-based modeling to characterize AE patterns associated with GLP-1 RA therapy and to explore herb-AE associations in an exploratory manner. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of AE reports from the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (2015-2025). Clinical characteristics included outcomes, reporting frequency, demographics, time-to-onset, and subgroup distributions. Signal detection employed disproportionality metrics and Bayesian approaches. Herb-compound-target-AE networks were constructed using HERB 2.0 and the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database, incorporating drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic filtering. Graph convolutional networks were applied to model herb-AE associations, followed by literature-based contextual evaluation. Among 142,705 GLP-1 RA AE reports, 4,090 involved obesity indications. Gastrointestinal events predominated, with 76% of reports involving female patients and onset clustering within 0-30 days. Semaglutide demonstrated a distinct onset distribution, including a higher proportion of late-onset cases (≥ 360 days). Strong signals were detected for biliary, pancreatic, renal, and coagulation events, with semaglutide-associated pairs showing reporting odds ratios > 10, whereas tirzepatide exhibited negative log-transformed reporting odds ratios for several gastrointestinal events. Network analysis and graph convolutional network modeling prioritized established medicinal herbs including Liquorice Root, Mulberry Leaf, Dahurian Angelica Root, Danshen Root, and Ginkgo Leaf as top candidates following degree debiasing and exclusion of non-herbal database entries. The graph convolutional network achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve/area under the precision-recall curve values of 0.798/0.841 (validation) and 0.666/0.719 (test), indicating moderate predictive performance within a sparse pharmacovigilance context. These findings describe real-world AE reporting patterns associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists and present a hypothesis-generating computational framework for prioritizing herb-AE signal associations. The results are exploratory and should be interpreted in light of the inherent limitations of spontaneous reporting systems and computational modeling frameworks, and require independent experimental and clinical validation prior to any clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.