ArticleScientific reports2026
Aflibercept biosimilar use and real-world outcomes in various retinal diseases: the AURA Korea study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This multicenter, retrospective real-world study evaluated the efficacy and safety of aflibercept 2 mg biosimilar SB15 (Afilivu®) across multiple retinal diseases. A total of 1083 eyes from 984 patients received 2762 injections between March 2023 and February 2025 at three South Korean tertiary centers, comprising 188 treatment-naïve (17.4%) and 895 switching eyes (82.6%). Diagnoses included neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD, n = 611), retinal vein occlusion (RVO, n = 182), diabetic macular edema (DME, n = 173), and other conditions (n = 117). Over a mean follow-up of 5.17 ± 2.76 months with 2.55 ± 1.09 injections, central foveal thickness decreased significantly by - 47.5 µm (95% CI - 55.2 to - 39.8; P < 0.001), while best-corrected visual acuity remained stable (mean change - 0.003 LogMAR; P = 0.572). Treatment-naïve eyes demonstrated greater anatomical improvement than switching eyes (- 93.9 vs. - 37.9 µm; P < 0.001). Retinal fluid resolved significantly across diagnostic groups: in nAMD, subretinal fluid decreased from 51.2 to 29.6% (P < 0.001); in RVO, intraretinal fluid reduced from 92.9 to 76.4% (P < 0.001); and in DME, intraretinal fluid decreased from 90.8 to 84.4% (P = 0.002). One case (0.09%) of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment occurred; no intraocular inflammation or other serious adverse events were observed. These findings support the real-world effectiveness and safety of SB15 (Afilivu®) in both treatment-naïve and switching populations across diverse retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.