ArticleScientific reports2026
Morphological identification of fungi associated with preharvest spoilage of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.) fruit in Bilo Nopha, Southwestern Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.) is a major fruit crop globally, but fungal pathogens have severely impacted its yield. Bilo Nopha, known for high-quality sweet oranges, has recently faced significant preharvest spoilage. This study aimed to isolate fungal pathogens associated with preharvest spoilage of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.) fruit in Bilo Nopha, southwestern Ethiopia. In the present study, a total of 240 symptomatic orange fruit samples were collected from six orchards of study area and fungi pathogens were isolated and characterized to genus level following standard microbiological techniques. A total of 430 fungal isolates were recovered. Pseudocercospora spp. were most prevalent (45.0%), followed by Colletotrichum spp. (42.1%). Alternaria spp. showed moderate prevalence (30.4%) with significant site variation (15.0-37.5%, P < 0.05). Rhizopus spp. were consistent across sites (20-30%, total 27.1%), while Fusarium and Phytophthora spp. had the lowest rates (17.5% each). Pseudocercospora spp., Colletotrichum spp., and Phytophthora spp. were identified as the primary fungal pathogens, whereas Alternaria spp., Rhizopus spp., and Fusarium spp. were involved as secondary or opportunistic pathogens. Species-level identification and targeted management are recommended to reduce losses and sustain production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.