Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286036›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Degree-based Inverse Prodeg indices linking graph theory and cheminformatics with sharp results and QSPR modeling.

Mohammed Alsharafi, Yusuf Zeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohammed AlsharafiDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen. alsharafi205010@gmail.com.
Yusuf ZerenDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Yildiz Technical University, 34220, Esenler, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degree-based topological indices are widely used in mathematical chemistry because they provide simple numerical descriptions of molecular graphs and can support structure-property analysis. In this work, we introduce the Inverse Prodeg index [Formula: see text] and its coindex [Formula: see text] as new degree-derived graph invariants. Unlike product-, sum-, and mixed-degree descriptors such as the Randić, sum-connectivity, harmonic, atom-bond connectivity, geometric-arithmetic, Sombor, Nirmala, inverse Nirmala, and misbalance prodeg indices, [Formula: see text] reduces to the vertex-wise concave sum [Formula: see text], whereas [Formula: see text] transfers the same inverse square-root degree weighting to nonedges using the original graph degrees. We establish their main mathematical properties, including bounds involving graph order, size, and degree extrema, equality cases, Nordhaus-Gaddum-type inequalities, exact expressions for standard graph families, and estimates under several graph operations. These results show that the proposed descriptors are analytically tractable and computationally efficient, with linear-time computability in the number of edges. To examine their chemical relevance, we evaluate a small Prodeg-based descriptor family on a dataset of 90 aromatic-carboxylate compounds using training and external test sets generated by the Kennard-Stone algorithm. The models indicate that these descriptors capture useful structure-property information, especially for size- and thermodynamics-related endpoints. Linear regression and partial least-squares regression achieved the strongest average external-test performance among the considered Prodeg-only models, with mean external-test [Formula: see text] across the nine core endpoints, while Ridge regression was close with mean external-test [Formula: see text]. Nonlinear methods did not improve the average prediction accuracy. Additional validation through bootstrap analysis, Y-randomization, residual diagnostics, and applicability-domain assessment supports a non-spurious but dataset-dependent predictive signal. Overall, the Inverse Prodeg index and its coindex provide mathematically well-founded and practically useful graph descriptors, although broader validation and combination with chemically richer descriptors are needed before claiming general predictive superiority.

Indexed as

CoindexDegree-based topological descriptorsExternal validationGraph operationsInverse Prodeg indexQSPR

Identifiers

PMID42286036
PMCPMC13518985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.