ArticleScientific reports2026
A multidimensional risk prediction framework for malignant intestinal obstruction based on machine learning: computational model development and clinical validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant intestinal obstruction (MIO) is a severe complication of advanced cancer. Traditional static assessment models struggle to capture its dynamic pathological mechanisms, limiting their clinical value. To address this, this study developed a multimodal machine learning framework. Core features (including the dynamic tumor enhancement ratio TER) were extracted via Lasso-Boruta dual-modality screening, and risk prediction was performed using an XGBoost-Random Survival Forest (RSF) cascade model. Results demonstrated an AUC of 0.84 ± 0.03 and Brier score of 0.19 in the internal validation cohort, with robust external validation performance. Clinical translation reduced mechanical ventilation duration by 41% and lowered antibiotic resistance rates from 37 to 14%. This approach ultimately provides dynamic, interpretable decision support for precise MIO diagnosis and treatment. This study enrolled 320 MIO patients, randomly divided into a training set (192 cases), internal validation set (64 cases), and external validation set (64 cases) at a 6:2:2 ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.