ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing circular industrial integration for sustainable yarn production with remanufacturing: a carbon policy-based modelling approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the textile industry presents critical challenges in achieving sustainable consumption and production. In response, this study develops an integrated sustainable production model for the yarn sector. The proposed model incorporates investments in green technology and wastewater purification systems, assessing their influence on both economic performance and environmental sustainability. The average integrated total profit of the system is optimized, and the model's practicability is demonstrated through a numerical illustration. The findings reveal that upcycling old garments enhances overall profitability by an average of 5.13% under both carbon pricing policies. Furthermore, while the CCT mechanism reduces green investment costs by 3.18%, the CT policy achieves a 2.29% reduction, highlighting the superior emission mitigation efficiency of the CCT approach. The suggested model advances sustainable production-consumption in the yarn industry by repurposing banana waste for yarn, and adopting the extended producer responsibility (EPR) directive, all while maintaining system profitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.