ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance of CNT-enhanced GGBS/fly ash concrete for precast U-drain applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the mechanical and durability properties of M40-grade concrete modified with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), fly ash, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The objective is to address the environmental and performance limitations of conventional concrete, which is heavily reliant on cement. Four concrete mixes were examined: M40 (control), M40 incorporating 40% GGBS, M40 containing 30% fly ash, and M40 with CNTs (0.01-0.15%). The mechanical properties compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength were tested at 3, 7, and 28 days, while durability tests such as rapid chloride penetration and water permeability were also performed. The results showed that CNTs, particularly at 0.03-0.05% concentrations, significantly enhanced the concrete's performance, with compressive strength increasing by 56%, tensile strength by 20%, and flexural strength by 39%. Durability improved, with a 100% reduction in water permeability and a 34.56% reduction in chloride penetration. Microstructural analysis via SEM indicated matrix densification and better hydration product distribution at effective CNT dosages. XRD confirmed enhanced C-S-H formation, but higher CNT dosages led to clustering, which reduced efficiency. GGBS-modified concrete outperformed fly ash-modified concrete, and CNT-modified concrete showed the greatest improvements. These findings suggest that CNT-modified concrete is particularly suitable for precast U-drain systems, where enhanced early-age strength, reduced cracking, and improved durability against chloride ingress can improve the service life and performance of drainage infrastructure. This concrete mix shows strong potential for high-performance, sustainable construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.