ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of gabapentin efficacy in patients with KCNQ2-developmental epileptic encephalopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
KCNQ2‑related developmental epileptic encephalopathy (KCNQ2‑DEE) is characterized by intractable epilepsy, cognitive impairment, and behavioral problems, highlighting the urgent need for precision therapies. This study aimed to promote the clinical application of gabapentin, a known Kv7 channel opener, in KCNQ2‑DEE by evaluating its efficacy in four patients carrying different KCNQ2 variants. Three patients with S6‑segment variants (p.A294V, p.F305I, p.F305del) showed clinical improvement in both seizure control and cognition following add‑on gabapentin. In contrast, the patient with the S4 variant p.L200P did not exhibit electroencephalographic improvement, although some developmental progress was noted. Functional analysis in homomeric expression systems revealed that the three S6 variants produced negligible currents, consistent with severe loss‑of‑function (LoF). The p.L200P variant, however, showed smaller currents than wild‑type (WT) at voltages below + 20 mV, larger currents at higher voltages, slower activation kinetics, and a depolarized shift in half‑activation voltage (V₁/₂), indicating a mixed LoF/gain‑of‑function phenotype. In heteromeric Kv7.2/Kv7.3 channels, p.L200P retained significantly higher current compared to the S6 variants, which may explain the poorer response to gabapentin in this patient. Together, these findings further support gabapentin as a potential precision therapy for a subset of KCNQ2‑DEE patients, addressing an unmet clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.