Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42286024›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Deep feature extraction and explanation consistency analysis for fine-grained aircraft type classification in remote sensing imagery.

Jiachen Liu, Lei Dong, Zijing Sun, Bo He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiachen LiuSchool of Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710051, China.
Lei DongScience and Technology Innovation Research Institute, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin, 300300, China.
Zijing SunXi'an Aeronautics Computing Technique Research Institute, AVIC, Xi'an, 710065, China.
Bo HeSchool of Equipment Management and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Engineering, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710051, China. 609189433@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine-grained aircraft type recognition in remote sensing imagery is of great value for military intelligence analysis and battlefield situation awareness. However, the limited transparency of deep learning decision-making processes restricts its application in high-stakes decision-making scenarios. To address this issue, this paper proposes an explainable aircraft type classification framework, termed EC-AT, which integrates transfer learning, explanation consistency analysis, and trustworthiness evaluation. Specifically, eight representative aircraft categories are selected from the MAR20 dataset to evaluate multiple deep neural network models under two settings: transfer-learning fine-tuning and random initialization. By leveraging pretrained model parameters and fine-tuning the classification layers, the proposed framework effectively improves feature representation capability and convergence efficiency under limited and class-imbalanced data conditions. To further interpret model decisions, three representative explainable artificial intelligence methods, namely Grad-CAM, LIME, and RISE, are introduced to analyze discriminative image regions from complementary perspectives, including class-discriminative activation, local perturbation-based approximation, and randomized input sampling. In addition, an IoMin-based spatial overlap metric is designed to quantitatively assess the consistency among regions generated by different explanation methods. Beyond explanation consistency analysis, the proposed framework is further evaluated using the Multisource AI Scorecard Table (MAST), which provides a structured assessment of model trustworthiness from multiple dimensions, including accuracy, consistency, logical argumentation, and visualization. Experimental results show that the transfer-learning-based models achieve excellent classification performance, with classification accuracy reaching up to 99.9%. The explainability analysis demonstrates that the proposed framework can identify key aircraft-related regions while revealing potential background interference and decision biases. Furthermore, the explanation consistency analysis and MAST-based evaluation jointly provide objective evidence for explanation results and the overall trustworthiness of the framework. Overall, the proposed EC-AT framework significantly improves the classification performance and explainability of fine-grained aircraft recognition in remote sensing imagery, offering a useful reference for trustworthy intelligent remote sensing analysis.

Indexed as

Deep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceExplanation consistencyFine-grained aircraft classificationIntelligent decision-makingTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42286024
PMCPMC13572402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.