ArticleDisability and health journal2026
Pregnancy occurrence, intendedness, and outcomes among U.S. females with and without disability, 2011-2019.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFemales with disability have higher risk for unintended pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to those without disability. Yet, prior research has not considered within-group and between-group differences by disability status and age.
objectivesAssess nationally representative patterns and compare prevalence of pregnancy occurrence, intendedness, and outcomes across disability status and age among females aged 15-44.
methodsWe analyzed pooled National Survey of Family Growth (2011-2019) data using designed-based F-tests to provide nationally representative estimates and modified Poisson regression to compare differences across disability and age-group of pregnancy occurrence, intendedness, and outcomes.
resultsAmong females aged 15-44, females with (59.9%) and without (59.6%) disability were equally as likely to become pregnant in the last five years, but our bivariate and multivariate analyses showed females with disability reported higher prevalence of unintended pregnancy, non-live births, and miscarriage. These patterns persisted for females aged 26-44. Among females aged 15-25, females with disability had higher prevalence of non-live births and miscarriage. However, compared to females with disability aged 26-44, females with disability aged 15-25 had higher prevalence of unintended pregnancy and miscarriage but lower prevalence of stillbirth.
conclusionsOur findings add to the literature on pregnancy occurrence, intendedness, and outcomes, providing insights to differences in the reproductive life course through our disability and age stratified analyses. These findings can help direct public health, clinical practice, and educational interventions to address higher rates of unintended pregnancy and non-live births, particularly miscarriage, for females with disability with consideration for differences across the age spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.