Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42285730›Full record

Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Central Venous Pressure Referencing in the Lateral Position: Comparison With Direct Right Atrial Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients.

Carl Sjödin, Jonatan Oras, Lotta Johansson, Per Persson, Sepideh Olausson, Jacob Holmqvist, Alexandru Ille, Nevio Vidovic, Carl Johan Svensson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06705374 (Central Venous Pressure and Right Atrial Pressure Measurements in Supine, Semi-recumbent and Trendelenburg Position), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06705374 completednot on this map

Central Venous Pressure and Right Atrial Pressure Measurements in Supine, Semi-recumbent and Trendelenburg Position

TypeobservationalSponsorVastra Gotaland RegionRan2023 to 2024Enrolled16ConditionsCritically Ill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carl SjödinRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2459-6195
Jonatan OrasRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lotta JohanssonRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-7144
Per PerssonRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sepideh OlaussonRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jacob HolmqvistRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alexandru IlleRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nevio VidovicRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carl Johan SvenssonRegion Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8265-9313

Funding

Sahlgrenska University Hospitals Research Foundations SU-984490Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-greement ALFGGBG-70150The Local Research and Development Council Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän VGFOUGSB-982802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRight atrial pressure (RAP) is a key determinant of venous return and reflects right-sided filling pressures in critically ill patients. Central venous pressure (CVP) is commonly used as a surrogate, but its accuracy depends on appropriate transducer levelling. While reference points have been evaluated in supine positions, evidence is lacking for the lateral position, despite its frequent use in intensive care. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether lateral positioning alters RAP itself.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, 16 sedated, mechanically ventilated ICU patients with central venous catheters were included. RAP was measured using a solid-state catheter positioned in the mid-right atrium, confirmed by waveform analysis and echocardiography. Simultaneous CVP was recorded with the transducer levelled 5 cm below the mid-sternum. Measurements were obtained at end-expiration in supine, 45° left lateral, and 45° right lateral positions. Agreement between RAP and CVP was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficients, and predefined clinical thresholds. Stepwise hydrostatic adjustments were applied to identify optimal reference levels.

resultsIn the right lateral position, CVP referenced 5 cm below the sternum closely approximated RAP (bias -0.4 mmHg; limits of agreement -3.2 to +2.4; ICC 0.85). In the left lateral position, the same reference point systematically overestimated RAP (bias -2.2 mmHg; limits of agreement -5.0 to +0.7; ICC 0.58). Adjustment to approximately 2 cm below the sternum minimised bias (-0.1 mmHg) and improved agreement (ICC 0.82). RAP increased in the right lateral position compared with both supine (Δ +2.9 mmHg, p < 0.001) and left lateral (Δ +2.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) positions, while no difference was observed between supine and left lateral positions (p = 0.78).

conclusionIn mechanically ventilated ICU patients, central venous pressure accuracy was position-dependent, and optimal external reference levels differed between lateral positions. Right atrial pressure increased in the right lateral position, suggesting that lateral positioning influences cardiopulmonary physiology beyond hydrostatic measurement effects alone.

trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06705374, registration date 30 April 2024 EDITORIAL COMMENT: The study showed that central venous pressure systematically overestimated right atrial pressure in mechanically ventilated patients placed in the left lateral position. This means that preload and venostasis can be misinterpreted in this position. The influence of increased right atrium pressure on venous return and cardiac output during left lateral positioning in mechanically ventilated patients requires further studies before the clinical relevance can be assessed.

Indexed as

Atrial PressureCentral Venous PressureCritical CarePatient PositioningRespiration, ArtificialAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesbody‐positioncentral venous pressurecentral venous pressure measurementcritical illnessright atrial pressureright atrial pressure measurement

Identifiers

PMID42285730
PMCPMC13263127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.