ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2026
Impact of virtual case conferences between primary care clinicians and an interdisciplinary chronic pain clinic.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the impact of virtual case conferences on referring primary care clinician knowledge, prescribing, and patient care practices.
designPaper-based postal survey.
settingThe USask Chronic Pain Clinic (UCPC) in Saskatoon, Sask.
participantsAll referring health professionals who participated in a USask Chronic Pain Clinic case conference between July 2023 and December 2024 were included. Participants included family physicians (87.3%, n=48 of 55) and nurse practitioners (12.7%, n=7 of 55). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The questionnaire collected data regarding participant demographic characteristics and various aspects of participants' chronic pain management knowledge, prescribing, and chronic pain care practices.
resultsA total of 168 questionnaires were mailed and the response rate was 32.7% (n=55 of 168). Most participants found case conferences to be a useful resource to their practices (94.5%) and reported that the service helped them with the management of their patients (92.7%). Many respondents reported improved knowledge about safe opioid prescribing (70.9%) and the process for opioid tapering (49.1%). Most agreed the knowledge they acquired from the case conference had been applied to additional patients in their practice (74.5%). Many respondents also felt more confident managing chronic pain (74.5%), more confident prescribing buprenorphine-naloxone for chronic pain (41.8%), and more willing to prescribe buprenorphine-naloxone for chronic pain (36.4%). Some had even prescribed buprenorphine-naloxone for chronic pain for the first time because of the case conference (30.9%).
conclusionCase conferences between UCPC interdisciplinary chronic pain team members and referring primary care clinicians may be a valuable service to support referring providers in the care of their patients and to increase the capacity of the primary care system to manage chronic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.