ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Lymph node fine-tuning FcγR signaling boosts anti-PD-1 therapy.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tailored FcγR blockade enhances immune checkpoint therapy and overcomes resistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy promotes the emergence of new T cell clonotypes within tumors, suggesting de novo priming in the periphery. Yet, the mechanisms that mobilize these additional T cells remain poorly defined.
methodsWe investigated the impact of anti-PD-1 mAbs on circulating T cell dynamics and their recruitment into tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) using multiple transgenic mouse models, including FcγR-deficient and type I interferon receptor-deficient mice. To dissect the role of FcγR engagement, we compared an Fc-silent anti-PD-1 LALAPG variant alongside conventional anti-PD-1 antibodies, and further extended our study to an additional immune checkpoint inhibitor for comparison. These approaches were complemented by experiments in FcγR-humanized mice using a human IgG4 anti-PD-1 mAb. In parallel, the effects of the therapeutic IgG4 antibody nivolumab were evaluated in human cell-based assays using dynamic imaging.
resultsHere, we demonstrate that anti-PD-1 mAbs promote the recruitment of circulating T cells into TDLNs, resulting in an expanded anti-tumor T cell response. This influx was part of a general reactive lymphadenopathy that required FcγR engagement and type I IFN production, leading to a burst of chemokine release. These results were extended to FcgR-humanized mice treated with a human IgG4 variant of the anti-PD-1 mAb and were similarly observed with another immune checkpoint inhibitor, anti-TIM-3, broadening this mechanism as a major one during checkpoint blockade in the LN.
conclusionsOur results reveal a previously unrecognized role for low to moderate FcγR engagement in TDLNs, which amplifies the anti-tumor T-cell response elicited during anti-PD-1 therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.