ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
The impact of prenatal and postnatal acoustic experience to the discrimination of native versus non-native linguistic rules in the brain: insights from combined electrophysiological and vascular signals in 3-month-olds.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some scaffolding of later language acquisition begins prenatally. Fetuses perceive slow acoustic features (e.g., stress patterns), while fast aspects relevant for phonetics become fully accessible only after birth. This study investigated how prenatal and postnatal acoustic experience influence 3-month-olds' neural responses to native and non-native linguistic rules. A multi-methodological combination (electroencephalography/EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy/fNIRS) assessing temporally and topographically precise neural signals was used, while infants listened to native/non-native pseudowords differing in stress patterns (prenatally accessible) and phonotactics (postnatally accessible). EEG and fNIRS revealed novelty/recognition memory effects for non-native rules (EEG: Nc and positive slow wave/negative slow wave components for phonotactics and stress pattern and fNIRS: larger activations for non-native phonotactic and stress pattern rules). The fNIRS further revealed mature right-hemispheric activations for stress pattern, while a still immature bilateral activation was present for phonotactics. These results suggest a potential impact of prenatal experience for slow prosodic features such as stress pattern and an important postnatal impact for fine-grained phonological features such as phonotactics in 3-month-olds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.