ReviewBlood advances2026
Analysis of cell-free DNA in lymphomas: from sample collection to genotyping and minimal residual disease monitoring.
Review in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly investigated in lymphomas because it enables noninvasive molecular profiling, longitudinal assessment of clonal evolution, and quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD), which reflects residual tumor burden and treatment response and serves as a clinically validated prognostic biomarker. The clinical utilities of ctDNA include supporting diagnosis, enabling early detection of relapses, and resolving ambiguous imaging findings. Current approaches for ctDNA assessment in lymphomas include droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, immunoglobulin clonotype sequencing, hybrid-capture next-generation sequencing with unique molecular identifiers or duplex barcoding, and phased sequencing. Establishing ctDNA as a clinical-grade assay requires rigorous quality control and standardization across all technical steps, from blood collection and plasma processing to cell-free DNA extraction, quantification, and analytically validated genotyping and MRD measurement. Large prospective trials and international standardization efforts are underway to define ctDNA-based MRD assessment as a reproducible and clinically actionable tool in lymphoma care. In this review, we outline key preanalytical and analytical workflows for ctDNA assessment in lymphomas and discuss unresolved challenges and future directions in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.